Objective: This study aimed to compare by finite element analysis between rhombic condylar plate and standard two miniplate in subcondylar fixation through measuring the stresses on the plate, the stresses transmitted to bone and fracture displacement. Material and methods : Two mandibular models were created through Mimics software. Model I: a five-hole Rhombic non locking Plate and model II: Two four-holes miniplates. The process of finite element analysis was done by ANSYS 18.0 software. Results : The highest stress on the plates were in rhombic plate. While the stresses on screws was higher on screws A in rhombic plate while higher on screws B in miniplates. The maximal bone stress was the highest in the rhombic plated model. Displacement was slightly higher in the rhombic plate model. Conclusion: The rhombic plate showed a higher stress than the two miniplates that was mainly because of the less hardware and numbers of screws in rhombic plate model.
Oraby, M., & El Halawani, G. (2022). Finite element analysis of rhombic plate versus two miniplates in treatment of subcondylar fracture. Egyptian Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 13(4), 166-170. doi: 10.21608/OMX.2022.168591.1172
MLA
Mona Oraby; Gaafar El Halawani. "Finite element analysis of rhombic plate versus two miniplates in treatment of subcondylar fracture", Egyptian Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 13, 4, 2022, 166-170. doi: 10.21608/OMX.2022.168591.1172
HARVARD
Oraby, M., El Halawani, G. (2022). 'Finite element analysis of rhombic plate versus two miniplates in treatment of subcondylar fracture', Egyptian Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 13(4), pp. 166-170. doi: 10.21608/OMX.2022.168591.1172
VANCOUVER
Oraby, M., El Halawani, G. Finite element analysis of rhombic plate versus two miniplates in treatment of subcondylar fracture. Egyptian Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2022; 13(4): 166-170. doi: 10.21608/OMX.2022.168591.1172